Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform / UGV for Military University of Land: Poland contract and delivery record

Development and reported outcome

On 2-Jul-26, Akademia Wojsk Lądowych – Instytut Logistyki completed a procurement award or result with Wojskowy Instytut Techniki Pancernej i Samochodowej (WITPiS) under Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform / UGV for Military University of Land Forces for 1 platform package / quantity not separately stated beyond procurement item of Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform (APW) / UGV with additional equipment.[S1] [S2]

Program, platform and stakeholders

Programme or contract: Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform / UGV for Military University of Land Forces. Platform or product: Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform (APW) / UGV with additional equipment. Recorded supplier, developer or relevant organization: Wojskowy Instytut Techniki Pancernej i Samochodowej (WITPiS) (reported headquarters/country: Poland). Recorded customer, operator or intended user: Akademia Wojsk Lądowych – Instytut Logistyki (reported headquarters/country: Poland).[S1] [S2]

Mission and technical scope

The following are classifications recorded in the source master, not additional claims of operational deployment: Mission/use-case classification: Logistics-institute training / research; autonomous tactical mobility. Operating mode: Autonomous-capable.

Contract, value and shipment signals

Original reported amount or scope: PLN 458,790 final contract. Original-currency label: PLN. USD figure or conversion stated in the master: USD 0.122 million — Calculated USD conversion. No additional FX conversion has been generated for this brief. Recorded quantity, delivery, demonstration or volume signal: 1 platform package / quantity not separately stated beyond procurement item. Delivery schedule, procurement window or milestone status: Supply and commissioning under awarded contract; exact handover date not disclosed. Recorded contractual start: 2-Jul-26.[S1] [S2]

Source verification and interpretation limits

UXV Searcher master source-coverage note: Award stage retained; the earlier May tender notice is not separately included.

Interpretation boundary: The source-specific record should be used to distinguish award, arrival, commissioning and completed delivery; these stages are not interchangeable.[S1] [S2]

UXV Searcher analysis — what the development changes

UXV Searcher interpretation — contract / recorded award outcome: The Poland UGV record for Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform / UGV for Military University of Land Forces is best treated as a committed commercial activity signal. The recorded award or contract is a stronger transaction signal than a tender; the amount and quantity still need separation into platforms, accessories, support and services.

Traceability for buyers: The dataset associates Wojskowy Instytut Techniki Pancernej i Samochodowej (WITPiS) with Akademia Wojsk Lądowych – Instytut Logistyki for Autonomous Multi-Purpose Platform (APW) / UGV with additional equipment. This supports stakeholder mapping; supply-chain tier, exclusivity and signed-customer relationships need the underlying source before firm classification.

Client-use interpretation: For intelligence users tracking Logistics-institute training / research; autonomous tactical mobility, the relevant next proof points are resupply/payload handling, terrain performance and actual operator demand. Watch for acceptance or delivery reports, contract modifications and whether the stated amount covers equipment or ancillary work.[S1] [S2]

Quantitative evidence, calculations and limits

Financial signal (master transcription): PLN 458,790 final contract. Classification: Stated contract amount; scope may include integration, support, services or accessories, not just vehicles. USD value qualifier: USD 0.122 million — Calculated USD conversion. This is preserved from the workbook and has not been independently converted or assigned to equipment beyond the master’s stated scope. Quantity/scope signal: 1 platform package / quantity not separately stated beyond procurement item. Counting rule: Order/award context; not proof that hardware has shipped or entered service. Delivery/timing evidence: Supply and commissioning under awarded contract; exact handover date not disclosed. Scheduling language is not independently proof of completion or acceptance.

Any volume or value must stay tagged to its awarded work package; mixed services, components and platform counts cannot be consolidated as vehicle deliveries.[S1] [S2]